Recorded on 4/19/2026 at 03:36 PM PDT
View Video
[00:00:00.510 --> 00:00:01.800] Okay, continue [00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:03.100] testing through [00:00:03.100 --> 00:00:08.480] here, and there [00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:10.970] still some drop [00:00:10.970 --> 00:00:11.680] frames. [00:00:11.680 --> 00:00:13.750] I feel like this [00:00:13.750 --> 00:00:17.190] little stretch here [00:00:17.190 --> 00:00:18.730] is also pretty [00:00:18.730 --> 00:00:21.350] notoriously [00:00:21.350 --> 00:00:25.660] inconsistent with [00:00:25.660 --> 00:00:26.770] the signal. [00:00:26.770 --> 00:00:28.860] So my expectation [00:00:28.860 --> 00:00:30.160] is that there will [00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:31.870] be some drop frames [00:00:31.870 --> 00:00:34.220] through this area. [00:00:34.220 --> 00:00:35.430] And really, you [00:00:35.430 --> 00:00:38.010] know, what we're [00:00:38.010 --> 00:00:39.220] trying to figure [00:00:39.220 --> 00:00:41.640] out is how to [00:00:41.640 --> 00:00:42.840] manage that. [00:00:43.260 --> 00:00:45.770] You know, there's [00:00:45.770 --> 00:00:47.280] this kind of battle [00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:51.250] between quality and, [00:00:51.250 --> 00:00:52.580] you know, [00:00:52.580 --> 00:00:55.840] availability, right? [00:00:55.840 --> 00:01:00.030] So you want to kind [00:01:00.030 --> 00:01:03.750] of decide, do I [00:01:03.750 --> 00:01:06.540] insist that the [00:01:06.540 --> 00:01:08.380] quality be good, or [00:01:08.380 --> 00:01:11.150] am I willing to [00:01:11.150 --> 00:01:11.960] sacrifice a little [00:01:11.960 --> 00:01:12.750] bit of quality? [00:01:12.750 --> 00:01:14.800] And when I say [00:01:14.800 --> 00:01:16.440] quality, I mean the [00:01:16.440 --> 00:01:17.600] quality of the [00:01:17.600 --> 00:01:20.820] video when other [00:01:20.820 --> 00:01:22.290] users are going to [00:01:22.290 --> 00:01:23.930] watch it, right? [00:01:25.140 --> 00:01:28.020] And if you are [00:01:28.020 --> 00:01:29.150] content to [00:01:29.150 --> 00:01:31.640] sacrifice some [00:01:31.640 --> 00:01:33.950] quality, then you [00:01:33.950 --> 00:01:36.690] can capture more [00:01:36.690 --> 00:01:40.960] conditions, even [00:01:40.960 --> 00:01:43.160] when the network's [00:01:43.160 --> 00:01:44.960] really slow. [00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:48.560] So, but, you know, [00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:50.530] maybe you don't [00:01:50.530 --> 00:01:51.590] want that, right? [00:01:51.590 --> 00:01:54.040] Maybe you'd rather [00:01:54.040 --> 00:01:55.510] have a standard [00:01:55.510 --> 00:01:57.670] that, okay, look, [00:01:57.670 --> 00:01:59.490] can't hit this [00:01:59.490 --> 00:02:02.820] standard, then don't [00:02:02.820 --> 00:02:05.200] bother to transmit [00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:06.880] anything, right? [00:02:06.880 --> 00:02:08.480] And that's kind of, [00:02:08.480 --> 00:02:10.190] I think that's kind [00:02:10.190 --> 00:02:11.670] of what we're doing [00:02:11.670 --> 00:02:12.350] now. [00:02:12.350 --> 00:02:15.360] And I'm looking for [00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:18.300] ways to adjust that.